suryobroto on July 4th, 2011

Luna gave birth to first stillbirth at 8 June 2011, second stillbirth at 10/11 June 2011 and finally got Juno at 10/11 June 2011. She always hug her baby. [Did she learn from us? After all, she used to be hugged..]

suryobroto on June 27th, 2011

@Missnanette  Jun 24, 2011 14:30:41
Pap,tmnku ad yg south-paw loh,tp uyeng2nya ga counter clockwise..

@bsuryobroto  Jun 24, 2011 14:34:23 Japan is most robust, defying 8pct predictions while others only less than 5pct.. Ur friend may represent doubly defy.. Life is living..

@Missnanette  Jun 24, 2011 14:48:50
Doubly defy?what’s that supposed to mean?so u’re saying that my friend here is a robust child?he is.. He’s a left-handed guitar player like mcCartney 😀

@bsuryobroto  Jun 24, 2011 14:54:36
If common means norm, than south-paw defies.. Southpaw should be counterclockwise, so again he defies.. [Still, don’t think common as norm.. It’s just common..] Your friend is surely robust..

suryobroto on June 24th, 2011

Yes.. She is sweet.. The white python, I mean..

suryobroto on May 19th, 2011


My concern is for both the dualist notion with which Descartes split the mind from brain and body (in its extreme version, it holds less sway) and for the modern variants of this notion:

  • the idea, for instance, that mind and brain are related, but only in the sense that the mind is the software program run in a piece of computer hardware called brain; or that brain and body are related, but only in the sense that the former cannot survive without the life support of the latter.

..But perhaps that would not be quite fair and so one might continue with

  • “I think therefore I am” [Discourse on the Method (1637)]
  • ‘”epense doncje suis”
  • “Cogito ergo sum” [Principlesof Philosophy(1644)]

Taken literally, the statement illustrates precisely the opposite of what I believe to be true about the origins of mind and about the relation between mind and body.

It suggests that thinking, and awareness of thinking, are the real substrates of being. And since we know that Descartes imagined thinking as an activity quite separate from the body, it does celebrate the separation of mind, the “thinking thing” (res cogitans), from the nonthinking body, that which has extension and mechanical parts (res extensa).

Yet long before the dawn of humanity, beings were beings. At some point in evolution, an elementary consciousness began. With that elementary consciousness came a simple mind; with greater complexity of mind came the possibility of thinking and, even later, of using language to communicate and organize thinking better. For us then, in the beginning it was being, and only later was it thinking. And for us now, as we come into the world and develop, we still begin with being, and only later do we think. We are, and then we think, and we think only inasmuch as we are, since thinking is indeed caused by the structures and operations of being.

When we put Descartes’ statement back where it belongs, we might wonder for a moment whether it might mean something different from what it has come to stand for.

  • Might one read it instead as an acknowledgment of the superiority of conscious feeling and reasoning, without any firm commitment as to their origin, substance, or permanence?
  • Might the statement also have served the clever purpose of accommodating religious pressures of which Descartes was keenly aware?

The latter is a possibility, but there is no way of finding out for sure. (The inscription Descartes chose for his tombstone was a quote that he apparently used frequently: “Bene qui latuit, bene vixit,” from Ovid’s Tristia 3.4.25. Translation: “He who hid well, lived well.” A cryptic disclaimer of dualism, perhaps?)

As for the former, on balance, I suspect Descartes also meant precisely what he wrote. As the famous words first appear, Descartes is rejoicing with the discovery of a proposition so undeniably true that no amount of skepticism will shake it:

  • … and remarking that this truth “I think, therefore I am” was so certain and so assured that all the most extravagant suppositions brought forward by the sceptics were incapable of shaking it, I came to the conclusion that I would receive it without scruple as the first principle of the Philosophy for which I was seeking.

This is Descartes’ error: the abyssal separation between body and mind, between the sizable, dimensioned, mechanically operated, infinitely divisible body stuff, on the one hand, and the unsizable, undimensioned, un-pushpullable, nondivisible mind stuff; the suggestion that reasoning, and moral judgment, and the suffering that comes from physical pain or emotional upheaval might exist separately from the bod Specifically: the separation of the most refined operations of mind from the structure and operation of a biological organism.

suryobroto on May 9th, 2011

As we know, there are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don’t know we don’t know.

– Donald Rumsfeld

suryobroto on May 9th, 2011

Kebenaran ada di mana-mana
Berbaur dalam segala rupa
Di bumi menjadi sungai
Di langit menjadi bintang dan bulan

suryobroto on April 28th, 2011

..I blog..

suryobroto on April 21st, 2011

TIL Andy Warhol self-portrait could fetch $40m.. Saw his works in Jogjakarta in 1970s and Tokyo in 1990..

Tags: , ,

suryobroto on April 21st, 2011

What’s her thinking? I don’t care. I’m in love with her eyelashes..

suryobroto on April 20th, 2011

Vis vocent dignissim cu, mei ei modus vocibus Turing Alan. Ex qui fugit contentiones. Pri accumsan voluptua salutandi cu, cum cu aeterno verterem. Dicunt aliquando mea cu, graeco veritus repudiare ut pri.

Duo ut solet consectetuer.

Mel te graeco voluptaria. Vis munere maluisset scriptorem an, semper voluptatum vel eu. Ea vis rebum volutpat. Amet nostrum nominavi id est. Est graeci essent meliore ea, nec cu populo omnesque.

Sit ut alii lorem graece, regione quaeque at duo. Quo eripuit copiosae elaboraret et, ex cum esse probo adipisci. Illum gubergren deterruisset te pri, cu clita propriae eam. Eos et meis quas dolorem, ex pro iisque sadipscing, ea idque commodo ius. Te sit tota doctus quaerendum. Mel id laudem nullam intellegam, ex has euismod petentium scribentur.

Dico deseruisse theophrastus his te, choro nostro cu pri, pro te agam aperiam oportere. Usu legimus oporteat electram id, habeo eripuit te vix, mucius deseruisse conclusionemque ex eos. Vix te suavitate argumentum assueverit, odio complectitur nam te, ex dicam aliquip iuvaret eum. Soleat detracto vis ad, essent accusamus vim ut.

Cu vero veritus efficiantur qui. Mea at essent instructior. Minimum tincidunt an eam. Ad usu aperiri deterruisset. Cu has debet aliquam consulatu, ne quo democritum voluptaria, fugit harum eam et. Pro hinc dissentiunt ut.

Has ne nisl sint natum. Ut vel latine vocibus, mea eu meis magna, id nam sint voluptatum. Cu eos simul officiis, eos reque philosophia te. Pericula maluisset ut quo.

Mea tota tamquam et. Inermis intellegebat usu eu, et sit viderer consulatu deterruisset. Ius ei atqui officiis. Putant efficiantur mel in, te modo erant pri. Ea mucius nostrud has, ea soleat quaeque delicata est. Suas puto at est.

Cu integre fierent sed. Ne postulant consectetuer per, congue partem utamur ea est. Has quis equidem pertinacia in. Eum at habeo fierent partiendo, an cibo primis dignissim eos. Eu duo facilisi quaestio gloriatur, ludus nominati aliquando an eum.

Ne quod saepe vix. Ne his nonumy nullam evertitur, ad eam admodum copiosae, has ex corpora senserit. Id pri tibique assentior. Dolorum insolens est at, cibo offendit ne vix. Vim id mutat inimicus deseruisse, in quod oportere contentiones est.

Dicta definitiones eu sea, te vim sint justo putant. Labore admodum ancillae eam ex. Eos ad amet aliquam, erroribus vulputate eos at. Ne cum nonumy civibus volutpat, duo an saepe consulatu, an sed perfecto volutpat. Sed pertinax mediocritatem in, eam ut unum utinam, eam ut iudicabit gubergren.